The History of Asbestos
It is believed that Charlemagne use asbestos tablecloths during the middle ages.
In the late 1800s, during the Industrial Revolution, the use of asbestos as insulation for turbines, steam pipes, boilers, kilns and other high-temperature machines surged.
In the twentieth century, researchers began to seriously study the harmful effects of asbestos. In 1917 and 1918, it was noticed that in towns where asbestos mining was a primary industry, many young people suffered premature deaths.
It was found that when humans come in frequent contact with asbestos, the fibers enter the body either through inadvertent swallowing or inhalation. When this happens, the fibers cause disease in the victim.
The newly discovered disease was called “asbestosis.”
In 1931, legislation was enacted to ensure that asbestos processing industries put ample ventilation for their workers’ work areas, and asbestosis was recognized as a work-related disease.
Despite the increasing number of published studies that showed the dangers asbestos imposed on people’s health, large companies continued to use asbestos despite the fact that safer insulation alternatives, like fiberglass, were available to replace it. Up to the late 1980s, asbestos was widely used in construction materials, from asbestos-cement sheeting for ceilings and walls, to corrugated asbestos cement used for roof cladding.
Asbestos companies have also had their own researches on the effects of asbestos - and they are hiding the findings of these researches in order to avoid their employees’ lawsuits. Million dollar lawsuits have been filed by asbestos workers for the health hazards their companies have exposed them to. Many of these workers already have mesothelioma cancer, and are facing certain death.
About the Author
Althaf Ahmed runs Asbestos Effects, a blog that answers people’s everyday questions related to business, Health and General life. You can read more How to advices at How To Do Anything
Injury lawyer claims asbestos victory
Many became terminally ill after their jobs at the firm brought them into close contact with the dangerous substance. The families of workers at the factory were also put at personal risk through contact with contaminated workers, in addition to facing the pain of losing loved ones.
The case has been ongoing due to the slow appearance of the effects of working with asbestos, which can manifest themselves years later in the form of aggressive cancers.
The latest twist in the rollercoaster trail of legal successes and setbacks comes with this month’s test case judgment defeating insurers, who were reluctant to validate ongoing payouts to ill workers. “It is a milestone. I feel enormous relief for the families involved,” said Mr Hankins, consultant to Rowcroft solicitors AES Winterbothams.
“This is probably one of the most aggressively fought areas of injury and disease in my professional life,” he said.
“This is also a very important case for Stroud as the lead defendant insurer was BAI and six test case victims defeated the insurers.”
Mr Hankins maintains that the insurer, BAI, had gone along for years with the payouts to the ex employees of Fibrecrete, before arguing in 2007 that the payments should only begin once symptoms of the associated diseases began to manifest themselves.
For many victims, diseases such as mesothelioma and lung cancer which are caused by exposure to the dangerous asbestos particles do not develop until up to 30 years after the original contact, by which point the majority of insurance policies would have expired.
Luckily after 6 weeks of arguing, the High Court found in favour of Mr Hankins and the ex employees of Fibrecrete.
“If they’d won there would have been nothing more disappointing than finding that, after working through a case with either a very ill person or a widow, that there was no insurance policy to pay out their compensation,” Mr Hankins said.
“These men are totally innocent but die dreadful deaths with these illnesses. There are also the wives and daughters who washed their clothes for them and inhaled the asbestos particles. These women had not done anything wrong and yet they too are deprived of their health.”
Mr Hankins, who said he came into his profession on a vocation to “right all wrongs”, expects asbestos cases to peak in about 2015.
“During the test case litigation BAI admitted that over the last two years they had rejected 284 fatal mesothelioma claims, whose f families are consequently still awaiting compensation averaging £125,000 each, which is a total of a staggering £35.5 million,” Mr Hankins said.
About the Author
Carys has more articles pertaining to injury lawyers and other legal related articles.
Businessmen Indicted for Asbestos Dumping
Paul Mancuso, 45, his father Lester, 70, and his brother Steven, 37, all of Utica, New York, were indicted Oct. 16 on several federal charges after illegal dumping asbestos. The charges include:
- Violating the Clean Air Act
- Violating the Superfund Act
- Conspiracy to defraud the U.S.
- Conspiracy to commit mail fraud
Illegal Asbestos Removal and DumpingThe Mancusos are alleged to have performed illegal asbestos removal operations and to have dumped asbestos-containing materials on the sides of roads and other non-permissable locations in upstate New York. Another member of the family, Paul’s brother Ronald Mancuso, pleaded guilty to illegally dumping asbestos and to conspiracy to violate the Superfund Act.
What is Asbestos?
Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral found floating in the natural environment. It is composed of multiple durable fibers that are resistant to heat and friction. When the mineral is broken, the strands of fibers separate, creating a thin, microscopic dust. Once in its broken state, asbestos becomes extremely toxic as it can be swallowed easily. Because of its durability and strength, it does not break down once ingested, but instead accumulates in the lining of the lungs, the stomach or the heart and after time can lead to development of fatal diseases.
Second Set of Criminal Charges for Paul MancusoThis is not the first involvement with illegal asbestos handling for Paul Mancuso; he was convicted of asbestos removal and disposal crimes in 2003, and of insurance fraud concerning his asbestos business in 2004. As part of his sentence for those crimes, Paul was prohibited from engaging in any asbestos abatement work, according to U.S. Attorney Andrew Baxter.
Fraudulent Companies, DocumentationThe recent indictment alleges that Paul later set up illegal companies in the names of his relatives and associates to engage in asbestos projects that contaminated private residences and businesses and dumped the removed asbestos at non-permitted sites such as roadsides.
Brother, Steven Mancuso, an attorney, is charged with preparing fraudulent documentation to give the appearance of legally conducted asbestos abatement by the companies. He faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine up to $250,000.
Years in Prison, Millions in Fines
Paul Mancuso, if convicted, could be sentenced to 55 years in prison and a fine up to $2.75 million. Lester Mancuso’s maximum possible sentence is 23 years in jail and a fine up to $1.25 million.
(Source: www.mesotheliomatreatmentcenters.org)
Getting Legal HelpIf you’re concerned about asbestos removal or dumping, contact mesothelioma centers to schedule a private, no-cost consultation with an experienced asbestos attorney today. Our attorneys understand the laws governing wrongful asbestos exposure and will fight to ensure your legal rights are protected.
About the Author
Helping mesothelioma cancer victims that have been wrongfully exposed to asbestos, a deadly mineral used in lots of products, navy ships, roofing, old buildings, cement sidings, insulation, textiles, flooring and much more. Please call 888-534-4023 for assistance with mesothelioma cancer (pleural, malignant, benign, peritoneal), asbestosis, lung cancer or asbestos cancer complications or if you or someone you know have been exposed to asbestos.














































